PAPER: New technologies: public perceptions

URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/03036758.2020.1850481

Conservation pest control with new technologies: public perceptions

January 2021

MacDonald EA, Neff MB, Edwards E, Medvecky F, Balanovic J. 2021. Conservation pest control with new technologies: public perceptions. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand 52(1): 95-107.

ABSTRACT

New genetic tools can potentially mitigate the decline of biodiversity. Democratisation of science mandates public opinion be considered while new technologies are in development. We conducted eleven focus groups in New Zealand to explore three questions about novel technologies (gene drive and two others for comparison of pest control tools): (1) what are the risks/benefits? (2) how do they compare to current methods? and (3) who should be represented on a panel that evaluates the tools and what factors should they consider? Findings from the content analysis of the risks/benefits revealed three main considerations that were of social concern – Environmental, Practical, and Ethical. Most participants were self-aware of their insufficient knowledge to compare the different technologies. Unanimously, respondents wanted the available information provided throughout the tool development process and saw multi-sector panel oversight as essential. Scientists and policy makers should match the public’s willingness to engage collaboratively.

KEYWORDS

Collingridge dilemma; CRISPR; gene drive; invasive species; public engagement; responsible innovation; synthetic biology

There are no views created for this resource yet.

Additional Information

Field Value
Data last updated unknown
Metadata last updated unknown
Created unknown
Format unknown
License CC-BY 4.0 (Attribution)
Created10 months ago
id761142f5-35bf-4696-a78d-c82edaf4ac7f
package id7a6f5d2e-dcf7-4e8f-b341-0060a79fa7e9
revision id07a3cd0d-fd84-4475-bea4-38952719e92c
stateactive