Many of our native species are slowly and silently tracking towards extinction. In order to reverse the decline of our natural bioheritage, we must be able to ‘see it’.
‘Surveillance’ comprises the systems, tools and techniques that enable us to track and anticipate impacts on ecosystem health by monitoring biodiversity, primary production and early detection of new invasive species that are killing taonga and our native environment.
Surveillance has repeatedly emerged as a critical research priority in the management of myrtle rust and kauri dieback. To date, data on the presence and severity of these diseases has been collected by many different organisations using a range of methodologies. Iwi and hapū are urgently seeking definitive answers about the presence/absence of these diseases in their rohe (area), as are all land-managers.
New Zealand’s surveillance system currently focuses on exotic pests and often overlooks ensuring healthy and resilient environments. The central investment under this Ngā Rākau Taketake theme is the Mātauranga Māori Framework for Surveillance (MMSF). This investment elevates the status of the environment into the surveillance system.
The MMSF considers the current surveillance processes and collection of data, and information required on pest presence and absence to establish baselines required by New Zealand’s primary sector.
It uses data and information important to indigenous ecosystems and narrative from rangatira (Māori authorities), hapū and iwi, who have whakapapa (genealogical link) and kaitiaki (guardianship) of their taonga.
The MMSF will use both existing and emergent understandings, values, approaches and opportunities to improve surveillance in Aotearoa, recognising the contribution from both Western and Te Ao Māori experiences and intelligence.
The environment-centric surveillance framework focuses on ensuring that the state and health of taonga and ngahere (forest) are elevated into any surveillance response. It does this using kauri dieback and myrtle rust as case studies to test the framework and model ‘proof of (disease) freedom’. It also provides the basis for the assimilation of up to date and accurate data and narrative regarding the extent of kauri dieback and myrtle rust, and the state of native bioheritage affected by the pathogens.
