@prefix dcat: . @prefix dct: . @prefix foaf: . @prefix xsd: . a dcat:Dataset ; dct:description """#Tranche 1 Pou: Science Excellence and Impact#\r \r ###Understanding the benefits, challenges and impact of BioHeritage’s approach to mission-led research###\r \r BioHeritage made an early commitment to co-design research with our Treaty and industry partners, endusers and communities, to maximise the impact and uptake of research outcomes. Co-design is challenging to execute and in this Pou we documented, published and shareed the learnings gained from our approach to mission-led science. It is important to document and share the advantages, challenges and unintended consequences of our values-led approach, to allow the broader scientific community and funders of science to learn from our experiences.\r \r Within the Science Excellence and Impact Pou, a research team was tasked with quantifying the effect of BioHeritage’s approach on traditional science metrics, such as publications, and identifying other (new) metrics that may better describe science excellence and impact. Te Aho Mātauranga, the Māori leadership rōpu, also worked to define and share measures of excellence and impact that are more meaningful and relevant to Māori researchers and communities.\r \r Finally, we collated and shared the many diverse impacts our research has had on biodiversity and society in Aotearoa.\r \r **Leader**\r \r - Maureen O'Callaghan, AgResearch.""" ; dct:identifier "9b40bff5-365b-46cb-955a-59e2d4a959fa" ; dct:issued "2024-08-19T00:00:56.398620"^^xsd:dateTime ; dct:modified "2024-08-19T02:12:44.653037"^^xsd:dateTime ; dct:publisher ; dct:title "Science Excellence and Impact" ; dcat:distribution , , , , . a dcat:Distribution ; dct:description """###Learning from a National Science Challenge###\r \r **March 2024**\r \r Biodiversity and biosecurity research helps to sustain a thriving environment, economy and society. But researchers and research programmes are often hindered by resourcing, institutional silos, and hypercompetition \r \r One experimental approach to address these issues was New Zealand’s National Science Challenges (NSC). Using publications, reporting, and interviews from the Biological Heritage NSC, we identify key learning about building large-scale collaborative research programs for enduring societal and environmental benefit.\r """ ; dct:format "PDF" ; dct:issued "2024-08-19T00:12:43.396155"^^xsd:dateTime ; dct:modified "2024-08-19T00:12:43.396155"^^xsd:dateTime ; dct:title "BRIEF: Learning from a National Science Challenge" ; dcat:accessURL ; dcat:byteSize 7993247.0 ; dcat:mediaType "application/pdf" . a dcat:Distribution ; dct:description """###Collective action is needed to build a more just science system###\r \r **June 2023**\r \r **Rayne A, Arahanga-Doyle H, Cox B, Cox MP, Febria CM, Galla SJ, Hendy SC, Locke K, Matheson A, Pawlik A, Roa T, Sharp EL, Walker LA, Watene K, Wehi PM, Steeves TE. 2023. [Collective action is needed to build a more just science system](https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-023-01635-4.pdf). Nat Hum Behav 7(7): 1034-1037.**\r \r **ABSTRACT**\r \r The current science system is unjust — from the systems that determine its membership to its outputs and outcomes. We advocate for contextually responsive, collective action to build a more just science system that demonstrates a relational duty of care to all its participants. To achieve this, we urge the science community to harness the powerful processes of complexity with deliberate intent.\r \r Science has been described as promoting exclusion and oppression by rewarding those who practice entrenched norms, including individualism, hypercompetition and productivism, and penalizing those who challenge them. Today, these norms permeate the design of scientific institutions and funding — reified in overt hierarchies and short-term funding cycles that disincentivize participatory and collaborative approaches.\r \r **KEYWORDS**\r \r Careers;\r Complex networks;\r Institutions;\r Interdisciplinary studies;\r Science, technology and society""" ; dct:issued "2024-08-19T00:07:17.422179"^^xsd:dateTime ; dct:modified "2024-08-19T00:07:17.422179"^^xsd:dateTime ; dct:title "PAPER: Building a more just science system" ; dcat:accessURL . a dcat:Distribution ; dct:description """###Co-designing a research programme for impact: lessons learned from practice by Aotearoa New Zealand's Biological Heritage National Science Challenge Nga Koiora Tuku Iho###\r \r **June 2023**\r \r **Duncan R, Robson-Williams M 2023. [Co-designing a research programme for impact: lessons learned from practice by Aotearoa New Zealand's Biological Heritage National Science Challenge Nga Koiora Tuku Iho](https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/epdf/10.1080/1177083X.2023.2227675?needAccess=true). Kotuitui-New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online: 1-26.**\r \r **ABSTRACT**\r \r Doing co-design and co-production is challenging, resource intensive, and outcomes do not always translate into action. Evaluations of processes are needed to identify what enables and constrains ‘co’ efforts. This paper draws on the findings of an evaluation of a co-design process undertaken by Aotearoa New Zealand’s Biological Heritage National Science Challenge, Ngā Koiora Tuku Iho (BHNSC) in 2019. The independent evaluation, commissioned by the BHNSC, draws on process observations and 25 semi-structured interviews with BHNSC leaders and process participants. In this paper, we present key insights from the evaluation through the application of co-production quality assessment principles and a knowledge governance conceptual framework. Our analysis identifies the BHNSC’s values as a critical factor in its journey to conduct a process that would foster collaboration between mātauranga Māori and Western science knowledge systems and deliver impact-focused biodiversity and biosecurity research. We propose an additional principle for assessing the quality of co-production processes: values-inspired.\r \r **KEYWORDS**\r \r Co-production and co-design; values-inspired knowledge practices; knowledge governance; mātauranga Māori; biodiversity and biosecurity""" ; dct:issued "2024-08-19T00:05:57.585416"^^xsd:dateTime ; dct:modified "2024-08-19T00:05:57.585416"^^xsd:dateTime ; dct:title "PAPER: Co-designing research for impact" ; dcat:accessURL . a dcat:Distribution ; dct:description """###Lessons from the BioHeritage National Science Challenge###\r \r **May 2024**\r \r New Zealand’s National Science Challenges (NSCs) were created as experiments in ‘mission-led’ research to reduce competition and address national-scale challenges. The end of the NSCs in June 2024 presents a critical opportunity to evaluate what did (or didn’t) work. This brief focuses on the Biological Heritage NSC.\r """ ; dct:format "PDF" ; dct:issued "2024-08-19T00:11:07.177274"^^xsd:dateTime ; dct:modified "2024-08-19T00:11:07.177274"^^xsd:dateTime ; dct:title "BRIEF: Doing science differently" ; dcat:accessURL ; dcat:byteSize 469003.0 ; dcat:mediaType "application/pdf" . a dcat:Distribution ; dct:description """###Co-designing a research programme for impact - doing science differently###\r \r **March 2024**\r \r BioHeritage’s mission is to reverse the decline of New Zealand’s biological heritage, through a national partnership to deliver a step change in research innovation, globally leading technologies, and community and sector action.\r \r Collective input from many participants with diverse knowledge systems is necessary to achieve such a large mission so in 2019, BioHeritage convened 11 scoping groups of 8 to 10 people including Māori partners, researchers,\r stakeholders, and end-users from a diverse range of organisations to co-design a set of goals and impact pathways for a nationwide strategy of research in the\r biodiversity and biosecurity sectors.\r \r An EOI process was held to select participants with 237 applications received from 64 organisations. People took part as individuals, not representing organisations, and brought input from their wider networks. We paid people for their time so they could devote attention, and recognised that this sort of input doesn’t come for free.""" ; dct:format "PDF" ; dct:issued "2024-08-19T00:09:28.119419"^^xsd:dateTime ; dct:modified "2024-08-19T00:09:28.119419"^^xsd:dateTime ; dct:title "BRIEF: Co-designing for Impact" ; dcat:accessURL ; dcat:byteSize 2892964.0 ; dcat:mediaType "application/pdf" . a foaf:Organization ; foaf:name "Challenge Inventory" .