@prefix dcat: . @prefix dct: . @prefix foaf: . @prefix xsd: . a dcat:Dataset ; dct:description """#Tranche 1: Project 1.1 #\r \r ###Whakamanahia ngā mātauranga o nehe hai oranga tangata, oranga taiao###\r \r Kaumātua-(elder) led research that puts Māori methods and mātauranga (knowledge) first is a key part of restoring Aotearoa New Zealand’s land and freshwater ecosystems.\r \r This is the fundamental concept behind this project, facilitated by Cawthron Institute’s Dr James Ataria and BioHeritage Kaihautū Ngātahi Māori Melanie Mark-Shadbolt.\r \r The team is co-designing their research with kaumātua (Māori knowledge-holders) and end-users.\r \r **Overview Te Tirohanga Whānui**\r \r Restore and futureproof the pre-colonial transfer of mātauranga Māori\r Contribute to the BioHeritage Challenge mission: to reverse the decline of New Zealand’s biological heritage\r \r **Highlights Ngā Mahi Whakahirahira**\r \r The real impact of this project has been the empowerment of biodiversity knowledge-holders to lead and guide research.\r \r Giving them space and place to kōrero (talk) about the issues they are facing in maintaining and transferring their mātauranga has been invaluable and feedback has been overwhelmingly positive.\r \r We have found our knowledge holders to be extremely open because the process has been tika (right).\r \r **Team Members Ngā kaimahi** \r \r - James Ataria – Rongomaiwahine, Ngāti Kahungunu, Ngāti Tūwharetoa; Cawthron Institute \r - Melanie Mark-Shadbolt – Ngāti Kahungunu, Ngāti Porou, Te Arawa, Te Āti Awa, Ngāti Raukawa, Ngāti Tūwharetoa \r - Simon Lambert – Tūhoe, Ngāti Ruapani ki Waikaremoana; University of Saskatchewan \r \r """ ; dct:identifier "0812eeed-368c-434f-8726-7c657b8e5145" ; dct:issued "2024-03-11T03:56:54.261283"^^xsd:dateTime ; dct:modified "2024-09-24T22:21:20.309647"^^xsd:dateTime ; dct:publisher ; dct:title "Mātauranga Māori For Biological Heritage" ; dcat:distribution , , , , , , ; dcat:keyword "Tranche 1" . a dcat:Distribution ; dct:description """###Tuākana/Teina Water Warriors Project: A collaborative learning model integrating mātauranga Māori and science###\r \r **October 2018**\r \r **Callaghan P, Paraone R, Murray M, Tahau N, Edgarton S, Bates E, Ataria E, Heremaia H, Rupene N, Wilson E and others 2018. [Tuākana/Teina Water Warriors Project: A collaborative learning model integrating mātauranga Māori and science.](https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/epdf/10.1080/00288330.2018.1509880?needAccess=true) New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 52(4): 666-674**\r \r **ABSTRACT**\r \r The Water Warriors is a collaborative project between Te Pā o Rākaihautū and Hagley Community College that was established to look after the waterways and re-connect rangatahi (youth) with these environments within urban Ōtautahi (Christchurch). Fundamental to this project was the opportunity to integrate science with mātauranga Māori as equally valid knowledge systems. In doing this, our pononga (students) will not have to wait until they are adults to enjoy and experience science through a Māori world view and through this work simultaneously bring to life a cultural narrative of science. This paper describes the Water Warriors initiative along with an active student voice reflecting on their experiences.\r \r **KEYWORDS**\r \r Environmental education; Te Pā o Rākaihautū; mātauranga Māori; water quality; urbanisation""" ; dct:issued "2024-06-25T23:07:01.893120"^^xsd:dateTime ; dct:modified "2024-06-25T23:07:01.893120"^^xsd:dateTime ; dct:title "PAPER: Tuākana/Teina Water Warriors Project" ; dcat:accessURL . a dcat:Distribution ; dct:description """###Mātauranga Māori: shaping marine and freshwater futures###\r \r **November 2018**\r \r **Clapcott J, Ataria J, Hepburn C, Hikuroa D, Jackson AM, Kirikiri R, Williams E. 2018. [Matauranga Maori: shaping marine and freshwater futures. New Zealand](https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/epdf/10.1080/00288330.2018.1539404?needAccess=true) Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 52(4): 457-466.**\r \r **ABSTRACT**\r \r This special issue brings together rich and diverse experiences and opinions on how mātauranga Māori is informing current, and can inform future, research and decision-making in aquatic environments of Aotearoa New Zealand. In this paper, we further describe the unique process of creating this special issue and discuss the guiding principles and emerging ideas from mātauranga Māori in relation to marine and freshwater kaitiakitanga (guardianship).\r \r **KEYWORDS**\r \r *Paranephrops planifrons*; \r harvesting method; \r knowledge management; \r populations;\r crayfish;\r values;\r harbor;\r mauri;\r koura;\r """ ; dct:issued "2024-06-25T23:18:52.247075"^^xsd:dateTime ; dct:modified "2024-06-25T23:18:52.247075"^^xsd:dateTime ; dct:title "PAPER: Shaping marine and freshwater futures" ; dcat:accessURL . a dcat:Distribution ; dct:description """###Effective Biodiversity Conservation Requires Dynamic, Pluralistic, Partnership-Based Approaches###\r \r **June 2018**\r \r **Gavin MC, McCarter J, Berkes F, Mead ATP, Sterling EJ, Tang RF, Turner NJ 2018. [Effective Biodiversity Conservation Requires Dynamic, Pluralistic, Partnership-Based Approaches](https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/6/1846/pdf?version=1528696215). Sustainability 10(6).**\r \r **ABSTRACT**\r \r Biodiversity loss undermines the long-term maintenance of ecosystem functions and the well-being of human populations. Global-scale policy initiatives, including the Convention on Biological Diversity, have failed to curb the loss of biodiversity. This failure has led to contentious debates over alternative solutions that represent opposing visions of value-orientations and policy tools at the heart of conservation action. We review these debates and argue that they impede conservation progress by wasting time and resources, overlooking common goals, failing to recognize the need for diverse solutions, and ignoring the central question of who should be involved in the conservation process. Breaking with the polarizing debates, we argue that biocultural approaches to conservation can guide progress \r towards just and sustainable conservation solutions. We provide examples of the central principles of biocultural conservation, which emphasize the need for pluralistic, partnership-based, and dynamic approaches to conservation.\r \r **KEYWORDS**\r \r adaptive management and governance; \r biocultural approaches to conservation; \r different worldviews and knowledge systems; \r gwaii haanas; \r nested institutional frameworks; \r multiple stakeholders and objectives; \r new conservation science; \r partnerships and relationship building; \r rights and responsibilities; \r social-ecological context; \r community-based conservation; \r natures contributions; """ ; dct:issued "2024-06-25T22:52:14.294744"^^xsd:dateTime ; dct:modified "2024-06-25T22:52:14.294744"^^xsd:dateTime ; dct:title "PAPER: Partnership-based approach to biodiversity conservation" . a dcat:Distribution ; dct:description """###Empowering the Indigenous voice in a graphical representation of Aotearoa's biocultural heritage (flora and fauna)###\r \r **January 2021**\r \r **Aitken J, Shadbolt M, Doherty J, Mark-Shadbolt M, Marzano M, Ataria J 2021. [Empowering the Indigenous voice in a graphical representation of Aotearoa's biocultural heritage (flora and fauna)](https://www.publish.csiro.au/pc/pdf/PC20027). Pacific Conservation Biology 27(4): 481-492.**\r \r **ABSTRACT**\r \r Aotearoa’s (New Zealand’s) biological heritage is in decline due to threats such as climate change and habitat destruction. Aotearoa’s biological heritage and the wider environment are critical to the Māori world view and culture and Māori have long advocated for greater engagement in efforts to reverse this decline. One negative outcome of localised declines in biological heritage is a concomitant loss of local Māori language (dialectical) terms. Compounding this is the growing use of standardised Māori terms that can displace local dialectical terms. This also runs the risk of losing the associated mātauranga (knowledge) that is inherent in the meaning of these local terms for their unique flora and fauna. Retaining this biocultural knowledge is considered important and could play a role in conservation efforts. This collaborative research addressed the concerns articulated by a Māori biological heritage expert about the loss of their own unique local Māori terms for flora and fauna. The research explored ways to retain and empower local indigenous biocultural terms via the creation of a static visual educational resource for Tūhoe–Tuawhenua youth displaying the forest vegetation of their rohe (area that defines a tribe’s traditional mandate or authority). The plants in the final resource are identified by their local Māori term and their corresponding scientific name. Depicting ecological accuracy in the artwork was a specific requirement of the kaumātua and created some unique outcomes in how the artwork formed. The approaches employed in this research and an analysis of the results and wider implementation are discussed.\r \r **KEYWORDS**\r \r Aotearoa, biocultural, bioheritage, fauna, flora, language preservation, language revitalisation, Māori, mātauranga, New Zealand, poster, species identification.\r \r """ ; dct:issued "2024-03-11T03:59:45.954002"^^xsd:dateTime ; dct:modified "2024-03-11T03:59:45.954002"^^xsd:dateTime ; dct:title "PAPER: Empowering the Indigenous voice" ; dcat:accessURL . a dcat:Distribution ; dct:description """###Whakamanahia Te mātauranga o te Māori: empowering Māori knowledge to support Aotearoa’s aquatic biological heritage###\r \r **October 2018**\r \r **Ataria J, Mark-Shadbolt M, Mead ATP, Prime K, Doherty J, Waiwai J, Ashby T, Lambert S, Garner GO 2018. [Whakamanahia Te mātauranga o te Māori: empowering Māori knowledge to support Aotearoa’s aquatic biological heritage. ](https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/epdf/10.1080/00288330.2018.1517097?needAccess=true) New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 52(4): 467-486.**\r \r **ABSTRACT**\r \r By providing an appropriately historical context, this article is able to consider the critical issues now facing mātauranga and the Māori knowledge holders today, and fundamental requirements that will empower application of this knowledge within bio-heritage management. We consider how the development of a methodology between mātauranga Māori holders and potential end-users might contribute to improved outcomes for Aotearoa’s biological heritage.\r \r **KEYWORDS**\r \r Bio-heritage; environmental management; indigenous rights; mātauranga; sovereignty; Treaty of Waitangi (Te Tiriti o Waitangi); vision mātauranga; research; New Zealand""" ; dct:issued "2024-06-25T23:12:35.171305"^^xsd:dateTime ; dct:modified "2024-06-25T23:12:35.171305"^^xsd:dateTime ; dct:title "PAPER: Māori knowledge supporting aquatic bioheritage" ; dcat:accessURL . a dcat:Distribution ; dct:description """###Reimagining governance for 'Yellowstone' modelled national parks in the new era of indigenous legal recognition.###\r \r **November 2016**\r \r **Ruru J 2016. Reimagining governance for 'Yellowstone' modelled national parks in the new era of indigenous legal recognition. In: Indigenous Rights in Modern Landscapes: Nordic Conservation Regimes in Global Context.** \r [DOI:10.4324/9781315607559](https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315607559), [Link to Chapter](https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315607559-15/reimagining-governance-yellowstone-modelled-national-parks-new-era-indigenous-legal-recognition-jacinta-ruru) \r \r **ABSTRACT**\r \r National parks provide an ideal locale for considering Indigenous customary rights and interests in modern landscapes. This is particularly true for national parks modelled on the first national park established in the ‘New World’, Yellowstone National Park in the US. This is because these parks are places typically owned and managed by the state, protected from private sale, for present and future generations to use and enjoy, and gain from them an appreciation of the country’s distinctive scenery, ecological systems, and natural features. The creators of these Yellowstone model national parks (first in the US, and subsequently in Australia, Canada and Aotearoa New Zealand, in that order) devised this new public governance property concept to transform the so-called ‘wild’ and ‘empty’ Indigenous ‘spaces’ of often initially mountainous landscapes into colonial ‘places’ for recreation, tourism and conservation. But denoting these lands as ‘wild’ and ‘empty’ was merely a convenient legal fiction that justified the taking of Indigenous peoples’ homelands.\r \r """ ; dct:issued "2024-06-25T21:45:26.499759"^^xsd:dateTime ; dct:modified "2024-06-25T21:45:26.499759"^^xsd:dateTime ; dct:title "CHAPTER: Reimagining governance for 'Yellowstone' " ; dcat:accessURL . a dcat:Distribution ; dct:description """###Values and human interrelationships with nature.###\r \r **January 2016**\r \r **Davidson-Hunt IJ, Suich H, Meijer SS, Olsen N 2016. Values and human interrelationships with nature. In: People in nature: Valuing the diversity of interrelationships between people and nature. Paracchini ML, Zingari, P.C., Blasi, C. ed. Luxembourg, Publications Office of the European Union.**\r \r **ABSTRACT**\r \r This chapter looks at how ‘value’ and values are defined and categorised, and whether different ways of looking at\r values can contribute to a better understanding of how humans relate to nature and make decisions about how\r they use and manage nature. It addresses three key topics – definitions of value, categorisations of value (as anthropocentric or non-anthropocentric), and different perspectives that provide insights into types of value. The chapter also provides recommendations about the contribution of different perspectives to the values considered in PiN assessments and programmes.\r \r """ ; dct:issued "2024-06-25T22:45:21.495927"^^xsd:dateTime ; dct:modified "2024-06-25T22:45:21.495927"^^xsd:dateTime ; dct:title "CHAPTER: Values and human interrelationships with nature" ; dcat:accessURL . a foaf:Organization ; foaf:name "Challenge Inventory" .